A comparative study between ultrasound guided and landmarks guided intraarticular sacroiliac injections in spondyloarthritis patients

Main Article Content

Plamen Todorov
Anastas Batalov

Abstract

Purpose: Sacroiliac joints (SIJ) inflammation and pain is particularly common in patients with Spondyloarthritis. Intraarticular SIJs injections represent a valuable therapeutic option in this condition. In the rheumatological outpatient clinics this procedure is usually done by landmark guidance (LG) or ultrasound guidance (USG).


Thus we aimed to compare the short term efficacy of USG vs. LG SIJ injections using five outcome measures: 1. Pain; 2. SIJ status (number of positive provocation tests per symptomatic SIJ on physical examination); 3. Disability; 4. Quality of the night sleep; 5. Patients’ satisfaction.


Methods: We enrolled 44 consecutive spondyloarthritis patients with pain in the SIJs that did not respond to NSAIDS and that were otherwise on a stable medical treatment. All patients also had ≥ 3 positive pain provocation tests per SIJ on physical examination. Patients were randomly allocated to receive a single SIJ injection with 7 mg Betamethasone (1 ml) and 1% Lidocaine (1.5 ml) either under USG or with LG.


Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in all outcome parameters. However, the USG approach performed significantly better than the LG ones in all parameters. In addition, there was a significant correlation between the improvement in all patient reported outcomes (VAS, RMDQ, JSEQ) and the reduction in the number of positive SIJ pain provocation tests per symptomatic joint.


Conclusion: Both USG and LG SIJ injections proved to be an efficient treatment for SIJ pain in SpA patients. However, USG of the intervention led to statistically better results in the present study.

Article Details

Todorov, P., & Batalov, A. (2020). A comparative study between ultrasound guided and landmarks guided intraarticular sacroiliac injections in spondyloarthritis patients. Archives of Clinical and Experimental Orthopaedics, 4(1), 001–008. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.aceo.1001007
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2020 Todorov P, et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Braun J, Sieper J. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet. 2007; 369: 1379-90. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17448825

Cohen SP. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101: 1440-1453. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16244008

Hawkins J, Schofferman J. Serial therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections: a practice audit. Pain Med. 2009; 10: 850-853. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19594847

Maugars Y, Mathis C, Vilon P, Prost A. Corticosteroid injections of the sacroiliac joint in the seronegative spondyloarthropathies. Arthritis Rheum. 1992; 35: 564-568.

Saunders S, Longworth S. Injection techniques in Orthopedics and Sport Medicine. A practical manual for doctors and physiotherapists. 3rd Edition, Elsevier. 2006.

Rana SH, Farjoodi P, Haloman S, Dutton P, Hariri A, et al. Anatomic Evaluation of the Sacroiliac Joint: A Radiographic Study with Implications for Procedures. Pain Physician. 2015; 18: 583-92.

Karabacakoglu A, Karaköse S, Özerbil ÖM, Odev K. Fluoroscopy-guided intraarticular corticosteroid injection into the sacroiliac joints inpatients with ankylosing spondylitis. Acta Radiol. 2002; 43: 425-427. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12225487

Dussault RG, Kaplan PA, Anderson MW. Fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint injections. Radiology. 2000; 214: 273-277. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10644136

Block BM, Hobelmann JG, Murphy KJ, Grabow TS. An imaging review of sacroiliac joint injection under computed tomography guidance. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005; 30: 295-298. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15898034

Fritz J, Henes JC, Thomas C, Clasen S, Fenchel M, et al. Diagnostic and interventional MRI of the sacroiliac joints using a 1.5-T open-bore magnet: a one-stop-shopping approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191: 1717-1724. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19020241

Fedorowski A, Steciwko A. Biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. Med Pr. 1998; 49: 93-105. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9587915

Pekkafahli MZ, Kiralp MZ, Başekim CC, Silit E, Mutlu H, et al. Sacroiliac joint injections performed with sonographic guidance. J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22: 553-559. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12795552

Perry JM, Colberg RE, Dault SL, Beason DP, Tresgallo RA 3rd. A Cadaveric Study Assessing the Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections. PM R. 2016; 8: 1168-1172. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178376

Kane D, Koski J. Musculoskeletal interventional procedures: With or without imaging guidance? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016; 30: 736-750. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27931965

Bogduk N. Pain provocation tests for the assessment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Spinal Disord. 1999; 12: 357-358. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10451054

Cattley P, Winyard J, Trevaskis J, Eaton S. Validity and reliability of clinical tests for the sacroiliac joint: a review of literature. Australas Chiropr Osteopathy. 2002; 10: 73-80. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17987177

van der Wurff P, Buijs EJ, Groen GJ. A multitest regimen of pain provocation tests as an aid to reduce unnecessary minimally invasive sacroiliac joint procedures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 10-14. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16401431

Slipman CW, Sterenfeld EB, Chou LH, Herzog R, Vresilovic E. The predictive value of provocative sacroiliac joint stress maneuvers in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 288-292. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9523780

Zou YC, Li YK, Yu CF, Yang XW, Chen RQ. A cadaveric study on sacroiliac joint injection. Int Surg. 2015; 100: 320-327.

Simon S. Sacroiliac joint injection and low back pain. Waldman S (ed.). Interventional Pain Management. WB Saunders. 2001; 335-339.

Rosenberg JM, Quint TJ, de Rosayro AM. Computerized tomographic localization of clinically guided sacroiliac joint injections. Clin J Pain. 2000; 16: 18-21. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10741814

Hansen HC. Is fluoroscopy necessary for sacroiliac joint injections? Pain Physician. 2003; 6: 155-158. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16883374

Sadreddini S, Noshad H, Molaeefard M, Ardalan MR, Ghojazadeh M, et al. Unguided sacroiliac injection: effect on refractory buttock pain in patients with spondyloarthropathies. Presse Med. 2009; 38: 710-716. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19217752

Klauser A, De Zordo T, Feuchtner G, Sögner P, Schirmer M, et al. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection considering sonoanatomic landmarks at two different levels in cadavers and patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59: 1618-1624. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18975358

Jee H, Lee JH, Park KD, Ahn J, Park Y. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint intra-articular injections in the noninflammatory sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: 330-337. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24121083

Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, Carreiro JE, Danneels L, et al. The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat. 2012; 221: 537-567. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22994881

Nacey NC, Patrie JT, Fox MG. Fluoroscopically Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections: Comparison of the Effects of Intraarticular and Periarticular Injections on Immediate and Short-Term Pain Relief. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 207: 1055-1061. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574965

Murakami E, Tanaka Y, Aizawa T, Ishizuka M, Kokubun S. Effect of periarticular and intraarticular lidocaine injections for sacroiliac joint pain: prospective comparative study. J Orthop Sci. 2007; 12: 274-280. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17530380

Borowsky CD, Fagen G. Sources of sacroiliac region pain: insights gained from a study comparing standard intra-articular injection with a technique combining intra- and peri-articular injection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 2048-2056. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18996232

Murata Y, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Takahashi Y, Shimada Y, et al. Origin and pathway of sensory nerve fibers to the ventral and dorsal sides of the sacroiliac joint in rats. J Orthop Res. 2001; 19: 379-83. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11398849

Fortin JD, Aprill CN, Ponthieux B, Pier J. Sacroiliac joint: pain referral maps upon applying a new injection/arthrography technique. Part II: Clinical evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19: 1483-1489. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7939979

Kehl A, Corr M, Weisman M. Review: Enthesitis: New Insights Into Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Modalities, and Treatment. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68: 312-322. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26473401

Braun J, Bollow M, Seyrekbasan F, Häberle HJ, Eggens U, et al. Computed tomography guided corticosteroid injection of the sacroiliac joint in patients with spondyloarthropathy with sacroiliitis: clinical outcome and follow up by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol. 1996; 23: 659-664. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8730123

Kim WM, Lee HG, Jeong CW, Kim CM, Yoon MH. A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular prolotherapy versus steroid injection for sacroiliac joint pain. J Altern Complement Med. 2010; 16: 1285-1290. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21138388

Slipman CW, Plastaras CT, Yang ST, et al. Outcomes of therapeutic fluoroscopically guided sacroiliac injections for definitive sacroiliac joint syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2006; 77: 937.

Savran Sahin B, Aktas E, Haberal B, Harman A, Canan Y, et al. Sacroiliac pain and CT-guided steroid injection treatment: high-grade arthritis has an adverse effect on outcomes in long-term follow-up. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015; 19: 2804-2811. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26241533